👤  RP

Content

- type: clear
- type: ask
  param: '1'
  message: 'Please provide p1:'
  options: null
  default: ''
  vision:
    enabled: false
    mode: area
    hint: ''
    send: true
- type: ask
  param: '2'
  message: 'Please provide p2:'
  options: null
  default: ''
  vision:
    enabled: false
    mode: area
    hint: ''
    send: true
- type: gpt
  prompt: >-
    Based on {{1}}, write the title. Follow the format below:


    [Write the title here]

    <single spacing>

    A research proposal

    <single spacing>

    By

    [Name]

    Author

    <single spacing>

    [Name]

    Co-author

    <double spacing>

    [Date]


    Remove the characters and symbols "*", "**", "***", "#", "##", and "###". Do
    not replace any characters with asterisks or hashtags when exporting to a
    text file.
  param: gpt
- type: paste
  text: '{{gpt}}'
  mode: null
  selectorType: ai
  lastKey: Enter
  selector: null
  item: null
  silent: true
- type: gpt
  prompt: |-
    Based on the info below, follow the format:

    Table of Contents

    I. INTRODUCTION
    1. Background
    1.1 Overview of the Topic

    2. Objectives
    2.1 General Objective
    2.2 Specific Objectives

    3. Conceptual Framework
    3.1 Theoretical Basis
    3.2 Conceptual Model/Diagram
    3.3 Hypotheses (if applicable)

    4. Scope and Limitation
    4.1 Scope of the Study
    4.2 Limitations of the Study
    4.3 Delimitations

    5. Significance of the Study
    5.1 Academic Significance
    5.2 Practical Applications
    5.3 Contribution to Policy/Practice

    6. Definition of Terms
    6.1 Operational Definitions
    6.2 Technical Terminology

    II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

    1. Related Literature
    1.1 International Literature
    1.2 Local Literature

    2. Related Studies
    2.1 Key Findings in Previous Research
    2.2 Identification of Research Gaps

    3. Synthesis
    3.1 Summary of Literature and Studies
    3.2 Implications for Current Research
    3.3 Justification of the Study

    III. METHODOLOGY

    1. Design
    1.1 Research Design
    1.2 Rationale for Choosing the Design

    2. Research Locale
    2.1 Description of Location
    2.2 Relevance to the Study

    3. Duration of the Study
    3.1 Timeline of Major Phases

    4. Population and Sample
    4.1 Target Population
    4.2 Sample Size Determination
    4.3 Sampling Technique
    4.4 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

    5. Data Gathering Procedure
    5.1 Data Collection Methods
    5.2 Instruments and Tools
    5.3 Validity and Reliability of Instruments

    6. Data Analysis / Statistical Treatment
    6.1 Data Cleaning and Preparation
    6.2 Statistical Tests and Analysis
    6.3 Software/Tools for Analysis

    7. Ethical Considerations
    7.1 Informed Consent
    7.2 Confidentiality Measures
    7.3 Approval from Ethical Review Board
    7.4 Potential Risks and Benefits
  param: gpt
- type: paste
  text: '{{gpt}}'
  mode: null
  selectorType: ai
  lastKey: Enter
  selector: null
  item: null
  silent: true
- type: gpt
  prompt: >-
    Additional Information:  Remember the 

    rules below:


    Rules


    The Resident or Medical Student Researcher


    Audience: Mentors, fellow residents, academic journals, or healthcare teams.

    Number of Words Per Sentence: 12 to 18 words per sentence.

    Tone: Professional yet developing, scholarly, and reflective.

    Style: The writing of a medical student or resident in their final stages of
    training is often a mix of academic rigor and personal reflection. Their
    tone is typically more tentative or exploratory compared to fully
    established professionals, as they may still be synthesizing their
    experiences with theoretical knowledge. The writing may feature a blend of
    evidence-based conclusions along with an emerging clinical perspective. They
    often write with an emphasis on practical application but may also highlight
    the learning process or unresolved questions in the field.

    Example: Case study, clinical research paper, or reflection on a clinical
    experience.

    Instructions: Present findings with a balance of evidence-based conclusions
    and personal reflection. Highlight unresolved questions or areas for further
    exploration.
  param: gpt
  silent: true
- type: gpt
  prompt: >-
    Based on the information at {{1}}, write the "I. INTRODUCTION" section.
    Follow the structure and number of words below:


    I. INTRODUCTION (1,500–2,000 words total)


    1. Background (400–600 words)

    1.1 Overview of the topic (100–150 words)

    1.2 Relevance of the study (150–250 words)

    1.3 Historical context (150–200 words)


    2. Objectives 

    2.1 Research Question

    2.2 General Objective

    2.3 Specific Objectives


    3. Conceptual Framework (250–400 words total)

    3.1 Theoretical basis (100–150 words)

    3.2 Conceptual model/diagram (Visual representation + 50–100 words
    -description)

    3.3 Hypotheses (if applicable) (50–100 words)


    4. Scope and Limitation (250–350 words total)

    4.1 Scope of the study (100–150 words)

    4.2 Limitations (80–120 words)

    4.3 Delimitations (70–100 words)


    5. Significance of the Study (250–400 words total)

    5.1 Academic significance (80–120 words)

    5.2 Practical applications (100–150 words)

    5.3 Contribution to policy/practice (80–130 words)


    6. Definition of Terms 

    6.1 Operational Definitions (10 Operational Definitions, 10-15 words each)

    6.2 Technical Terminology (10 Technical Terminology, 10-15 words each)


    COMMAND PROMPT:


    As a researcher working on a Research Protocol, your task is to develop a
    comprehensive Introduction section for your study. The output must be
    well-structured and aligned with the research objectives, maintaining
    consistency with previous sections. Ensure that all components are clearly
    defined and explained in detail. Your introduction should be rigorous,
    thoughtful, and demonstrate a high level of research integrity.


    The Introduction section should include the following subsections:


    Background of the Study


    Provide a detailed background that aligns with the provided study title,
    research question, general objective, and specific objectives found at
    {{1}}.

    Discuss the historical and theoretical context of the study.

    Explain the relevance of the study and why it is necessary.


    Objectives of the Study


    Clearly state the General Objective using {{1}}.

    List the Specific Objectives provided in {{1}}.


    Conceptual Framework


    Outline the theoretical foundation and key concepts guiding the study.

    Describe the relationships between variables and how they support research
    objectives.

    Explain how this framework informs research design and methodology.

    Discuss any potential limitations or challenges in applying this framework.


    Scope and Limitation


    Define the boundaries and constraints that govern the research design.

    Specify the population, geographical location, time frame, and resources
    included in the study.

    Identify potential challenges or limitations that could affect the validity
    and generalizability of findings.


    Significance of the Study


    Explain why the research is important and how it contributes to the field.

    Discuss the impact, implications, and applications of the findings.

    Highlight the unique contributions of the study.

    Avoid repeating points covered in other sections.


    Definition of Terms


    Provide clear and concise definitions of at least 10 key terms related to
    the study.

    Ensure the definitions are understandable for both experts and non-experts.

    Maintain accuracy to support research validity.

    Each must be cohesive with previous outputs while adhering to the research
    protocol structure. Write the section title for each part. Ensure clarity,
    precision, and consistency throughout the introduction.


    Remove the characters and symbols "", "*", "*", "#", "##", and "###". Do not
    replace any characters with asterisks or hashtags when exporting to a text
    file.
  param: gpt
- type: paste
  text: '{{gpt}}'
  mode: null
  selectorType: ai
  lastKey: Enter
  selector: null
  item: null
  silent: true
- type: gpt
  prompt: >-
    Based on the information at {{2}}, write the "II. REVIEW OF RELATED
    LITERATURE AND STUDIES" section.  Follow the structure and number of words
    below:


    II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES (2,000–2,500 words total)


    1. Related Literature (1,000–1,300 words total)

    1.1 International literature (500–700 words, covering III–V key studies)

    1.2 Local literature (400–600 words, covering II–IV key studies)


    2. Related Studies (700–1,000 words total, covering IV–VI relevant studies)

    2.2 Key findings in previous research (500–700 words)

    2.3 Identification of research gaps (200–300 words)


    3. Synthesis (300–500 words total)

    3.1 Summary of literature and studies (150–250 words)

    3.2 Implications for current research (100–150 words)

    3.3 Justification of the study (50–100 words)


    COMMAND PROMPT:


    As a researcher working on a research protocol, your task is to conduct a
    comprehensive review of existing literature and empirical studies related to
    the research topic. Your review should be structured into the following
    sections:


    Review of Related Literature


    Review existing literature on the research topic, covering key concepts,
    theories, and models that form the foundation of the study.

    Use the uploaded references from {{2}} to support your discussion.


    Review of Related Studies


    Present a chronological or thematic review of empirical studies directly
    related to the research topic.

    For each study, briefly describe the research objectives, methodology used,
    key findings, and relevance to the current study.

    Highlight any gaps or contradictions in existing research that the current
    study aims to address.

    Use the uploaded references {{2}} to support your discussion.


    Synthesis of Literature and Studies


    Summarize the main points from both the related literature and related
    studies sections.

    Identify patterns, trends, or themes that emerge from the reviewed
    materials.

    Discuss how the current study fits into the existing body of knowledge and
    how this review informs the research questions or hypotheses of the current
    study.

    Provide a clear rationale for the research based on the findings from the
    literature and studies.

    Ensure clarity, coherence, and academic rigor in your writing. Use formal
    academic language and proper citation formatting where necessary."


    Remove the characters and symbols "", "*", "*", "#", "##", and "###". Do not
    replace any characters with asterisks or hashtags when exporting to a text
    file.
  param: gpt
- type: paste
  text: '{{gpt}}'
  mode: null
  selectorType: ai
  lastKey: Enter
  selector: null
  item: null
  silent: true
- type: ask
  param: p1
  message: 'Please provide p1:'
- type: gpt
  prompt: >-
    Based on the information at {{1}}, write the "III. METHODOLOGY" section.
    Follow the structure and number of words below:


    III. METHODOLOGY (1,500–2,000 words total)


    1. Design (250–350 words)

    1.1 Research design (100–150 words)

    1.2 Rationale (100–150 words)


    2. Research Locale (100–200 words)


    3. Duration of the Study (50–100 words, with a timeline table if applicable)


    4. Population and Sample (250–400 words total)

    4.1 Target population (100–150 words)

    4.2 Sample size and technique (100–150 words)

    4.3 Inclusion and exclusion criteria (50–100 words)


    5. Data Gathering Procedure (300–500 words total)

    5.1 Data collection methods (150–250 words)

    5.2 Instruments and tools (100–150 words)

    5.3 Validity and reliability (50–100 words)


    6. Data Analysis / Statistical Treatment (250–400 words total)

    6.1 Data cleaning and preparation (100–150 words)

    6.2 Statistical tests and analysis (100–150 words)

    6.3 Software/tools for analysis (50–100 words)


    7. Ethical Considerations (200–300 words total)

    7.1 Informed consent (50–100 words)

    7.2 Confidentiality measures (50–100 words)

    7.3 Approval from the ethical review board (50–100 words)

    7.4 Potential risks and benefits (50–100 words)


    COMMAND PROMPT:


    As a researcher working on a research protocol, your task is to develop a
    comprehensive Methodology section for your study. The output must be
    well-structured and aligned with the research objectives, maintaining
    consistency with previous sections. Ensure that all components are clearly
    defined and explained in detail. Your methodology should be rigorous,
    thoughtful, and demonstrate a high level of research integrity.


    The Methodology section should include the following subsections:


    Research Design


    Describe the study design and justify its appropriateness for the research
    objectives.

    Explain the specific methods and procedures used for data collection and
    analysis.

    Discuss how the methodology aligns with the research questions and
    objectives.


    Research Locale


    Provide a detailed description of the geographical location where the study
    will take place.

    Include information on demographics, cultural aspects, and relevant features
    that may impact research findings.

    Justify why this location was chosen and discuss any challenges or
    limitations associated with conducting research there.


    Duration of the Study


    Outline the specific time frame for the study, including participant
    involvement and frequency of data collection.

    Explain how the duration aligns with the research objectives and
    methodology.

    Discuss any follow-up periods and potential challenges in maintaining the
    study timeline.


    Population and Sample


    Define the target population and describe the sample size determination
    method.

    Specify the sampling technique and the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

    Justify the sample size and include the formula used for calculation,
    showing the full computation and result in plain text.


    Data Gathering Procedure


    Describe the step-by-step process of collecting data, including methods,
    tools, and participants involved.

    Consider ethical considerations such as participant consent, data
    reliability, and validity.

    Data Analysis and Statistical Treatment


    Detail the statistical methods that will be used to analyze the collected
    data.

    Discuss how these methods align with the research objectives and anticipated
    challenges in data analysis.


    Ethical Considerations


    Address key ethical concerns such as informed consent, privacy protection,
    potential risks, equitable treatment, data management, and transparency in
    reporting.

    Ensure alignment with Philippine research ethics standards and discuss how
    participant rights and well-being will be upheld.

    Each section must be cohesive with previous outputs while adhering to the
    research protocol structure. Write the section title for each part. Ensure
    clarity, precision, and consistency throughout the methodology.


    Remove the characters and symbols "", "*", "*", "#", "##", and "###". Do not
    replace any characters with asterisks or hashtags when exporting to a text
    file.
  param: gpt
- type: paste
  text: '{{gpt}}'
  mode: null
  selectorType: ai
  lastKey: Enter
  selector: null
  item: null
  silent: true
- type: gpt
  prompt: >-
    Based on the information at {{2}}, write the "IV. REFERENCES" section. 


    IV.REFERENCES        

    (Write all the references in {{2}} in APA format with DOI tags and clickable
    link for easy verification)


    Remove the characters and symbols "", "*", "*", "#", "##", and "###". Do not
    replace any characters with asterisks or hashtags when exporting to a text
    file.
  param: gpt
- type: paste
  text: '{{gpt}}'
  mode: null
  selectorType: ai
  lastKey: Enter
  selector: null
  item: null
  silent: true